Could the Presidential Election Turn On a Dime?
(Not if the WaPo Banksters Have Their Way) By Bill Watkins |
September 10, 2011
On Wednesday night during the debate among
GOP Presidential candidates at the Ronald Reagan Presidential
Library, some Establishment candidates were yammering on
about the high price of gasoline under the Obama administration,
and how they would rectify that situation if they were elected
President.
And then it happened. A "game changer"
moment that could transform the entire election, or perhaps
American history, irrespective of the election results.
Ron Paul had the impertinence to point out to a national
audience that gasoline could actually be purchased RIGHT
NOW for a mere ten cents per gallon!
Really? Now? Where? Congressman Paul explained
that a SILVER dime is currently worth over $3.00, which
is nearly enough to buy a gallon of petrol in the U.S. You
remember those Mercury head dimes, don’t you? What
ever happened to those? And, come to think of it, why doesn’t
a dime minted in 2011 buy a gallon of gas?
Admittedly, it’s a simple question.
And that why it’s so dangerous. This line of thinking
simply can’t be allowed to gain traction. It’s
crazy talk by Ron Paul who stubbornly clings to a bygone
era of monetary policy (including relevant clauses of the
Constitution) and who simply doesn’t comprehend the
modern wonders of "quantitative easing." Move
along citizens, there’s nothing here to see. Got it?
That’s the thrust of an editorial
written by Charles Lane and published in the WaPo on the
morning immediately following the debate. Egad, the idea
of SILVER currency is soooo "18th century" according
to Lane. Never mind that dimes, quarters and half dollars
minted by the U.S. government were comprised of at least
90% silver for the entire 19th century and for nearly 65
years of the 20th century too (i.e. until 1964). Mr. Lane
apparently wasn’t aware of such recent history.
Or was he? Of all the debate moments to
critique, why did the WaPo deem it necessary to challenge
this one particular point that was made so well by Ron Paul?
Hmmm, let’s see now. Why on earth would the WaPo attempt
to ridicule anyone who poses a threat to the power structure
that depends on the depredations of the FED? What animus
could the WaPo possibly have against a 10 term Congressman
who wrote a book entitled, End the Fed, and whose son was
recently elected as a U.S. Senator?
Perhaps the WaPo editorial attack on Ron
Paul can be explained by the following additional facts,
which have previously been pointed out by Lew Rockwell,
and which reveal the true agenda of the Establishment and
their paymasters (the Banksters) who are terrified that
the American public might actually begin to wonder who is
responsible for the ongoing monetary devaluation that Ron
Paul illustrated with such devastating effect during the
debate:
The present publisher of The Post, Ms. Weymouth, is
granddaughter of Katherine Graham (known as Katherine
the Great), and great-granddaughter of Eugene Meyer, who
bought The Post out of bankruptcy in 1933, and who was
….
….. wait for it …
Chairman of the Federal Reserve and
the first head of the World Bank.
Mr. Meyer was succeeded in this last
post by John J. McCloy, later chairman of the Rockefeller's
Chase Manhattan Bank, the Council on Foreign Relations,
the Ford Foundation, and key member of the Warren Commission.
He was widely regarded by wags in the know as "the
Chairman of the Establishment."
Ms. Weymouth’s grandfather, Philip
Graham, succeeded her great grandfather, Mr. Meyer, as
publisher of The Post in 1946, and was married to Mr.
Meyer’s daughter, Katherine. The Grahams used to
put on famous Georgetown soirees for the Beltway elites
in journalism, intelligence circles, and the upper ranks
of the Washington Nomenclatura, described in Hugh Wilford's
book The Mighty Wurlitzer: How the CIA Played America.
The term "the mighty Wurlitzer,"
coined by high level CIA official Frank Wisner, was used
to describe the elaborate covert networks of propaganda,
deception, and media manipulation sponsored by the Agency.
A key player in this campaign of Cold War subterfuge and
deceit was "the Golden Boy"— Washington
Post publisher Phil Graham (the husband of Katherine --
and Eugene Meyer's son-in-law), who later committed suicide
(although some informed observers, such as the distinguished
award-winning journalist and historian Sterling Seagrave,
believe otherwise).
With a pedigree like that, it begins to make
sense why the WaPo simply couldn’t allow Ron Paul to
speak the truth about our ongoing money devaluation without
being given the "treatment". Former WaPo writer,
Carl Bernstein, in his famous Rolling Stone article, The CIA
and the Media, gave a further glimpse into the pedigree behind
the WaPo propaganda platform that Ms Weymouth inherited, which
he described as follows:
"When Newsweek was purchased by the
Washington Post Company, publisher Philip L. Graham was
informed by Agency officials that the CIA occasionally used
the magazine for cover purposes, according to CIA sources.
"It was widely known that Phil Graham was somebody
you could get help from," said a former deputy director
of the Agency. "Frank Wisner dealt with him."
Wisner, deputy director of the CIA from 1950 until shortly
before his suicide in 1965, was the Agency's premier orchestrator
of "black" operations, including many in which
journalists were involved. Wisner liked to boast of his
"mighty Wurlitzer," a wondrous propaganda instrument
he built, and played, with help from the press.) Phil Graham
was probably Wisner's closest friend. But Graham, who committed
suicide in 1963, apparently knew little of the specifics
of any cover arrangements with Newsweek, CIA sources said.
None of this is conspiracy theory. Just plain
old history. But, just for fun, consider that Katherine Graham’s
1997 autobiography says that her husband (WaPo publisher,
Philip Graham) was instrumental in getting Lyndon Johnson
to be the Democratic Vice Presidential nominee in 1960. And,
consider also that her father handed the reigns of the fledgling
World Bank to Mr. Establishment (McCloy), who later became
a member of the Warren Commission, which certainly tried its
best to make sure that nobody would ponder the motives or
means of anyone (beyond Oswald) or any organization that might
be interested in seeing a certain V.P. become the POTUS.
And it’s also interesting to reflect
for a moment on the last 3 words of the excerpt from Bernstein’s
article which is quoted above. Bernstein is smart enough to
"consider the source," but he doesn’t appear
to question the assertion of his CIA source in any way. Of
course, if Mr. Graham didn’t know too much about the
CIA arrangements with Newsweek (owned by the WaPo) as the
"CIA source said", there wouldn’t be any need
for his suicide to be arranged, would there? But, the same
can’t necessarily be said for Mr. Wisner, the deputy
director of the CIA in 1965, who was the best friend of Mr.
Graham, and who also apparently carried a heavy burden that
ended in his subsequent suicide a mere two years later.
JFK was the last President who presided
over coinage of 90% silver money that Mr. Lane at the WaPo
holds in such contempt. In 1971, a mere 8 years after JFK
was assassinated, President Nixon severed all ties between
the U.S. dollar and gold, and the ensuing 30 years have witnessed
the dramatic loss of purchasing power that was beautifully
illustrated by Ron Paul’s reference to one thin dime.
After the demise of the gold standard under
Nixon, another GOP President was elected after serving as
CIA Director. This President was descended from an executive
of the investment banking firm, Brown Brothers Harriman, which
according to at least one description, "is particularly
notable because of the large number of influential American
politicians, government appointees, and central bankers who
have worked at the company since its foundation…"
(To be fair, on the Democrat side of things, Obama’s
extensive ties to the Goldman Sachs investment banking firm
demonstrates that both parties are beholden to the Banksters).
Ron Paul is not singing from the same monetary
hymnal used by Richard Nixon, G.H.W.B. or Barry Goldman Obama.
He dares to remind folks about what has been happening to
our money since the days of JFK (and even before that). Perhaps
Ron Paul should consider himself lucky that he has only suffered
(so far) the indignation of the WaPo for speaking and writing
about the depredations of the Fed and by running for the Presidency.
His courage in doing so is remarkable in light of the recent
history (post 18th century) that Mr. Lane would like to ignore,
including the sorry history of the WaPo.